somayeh Amiri; Abbas Ahmadi Saadi; Mohamad Ali Akhgar
Volume 10, Issue 2 , March 2022, , Pages 89-108
Abstract
Since time immemorial in Islamic and Christian civilization, thinkers and theologians have raised many discussions about the concept of faith and disbelief and the issues surrounding them with different interpretive, philosophical, theological and mystical approaches. These topics have brought many social ...
Read More
Since time immemorial in Islamic and Christian civilization, thinkers and theologians have raised many discussions about the concept of faith and disbelief and the issues surrounding them with different interpretive, philosophical, theological and mystical approaches. These topics have brought many social reflections such as excommunication and sanctification. After explaining the difference between science and knowledge, Eynolghozat Hamedani considered the way of true knowledge to be beyond reason and by criticizing the philosophers in the discussion of the essential concept of faith, he stated that its meaning is to confirm the words of the prophets and the lowest order is to act in accordance with the commands and directions of God. he does. Faith has two aspects: knowledge and action, and its sign is "bowing to Allah" and "loving God's people". After stating the types of disbelief, he considers some types of disbelief to be acceptable but also necessary for faith. On the other hand, with a philosophical epistemological perspective, in the meaning of faith and unbelief, Mulla Sadra gives originality to science and knowledge and gives the main role to knowledge and science in all levels of faith such as verbal, imitative, proof and even discovery faith. He considers disbelief to be the worst form of ignorance. In this article, the views of Eynolghozat Hamedani (492-525 AH) and Mulla Sadra (1050-979 AH) about faith and disbelief and some of their important issues have been comparatively investigated with a descriptive and analytical method.
zeinab usefi; mohammad ali akhgar; Abbas Ahmadi Saadi
Volume 10, Issue 1 , December 2021, , Pages 159-179
Abstract
In this article, the issue of religious plurality and diversity in Javadi Amoli's views and his answer to the following main questions is examined. The purpose of this study is to use a descriptive-analytical method to typology of Javadi Amoli's view on the issue of religious diversity and to include ...
Read More
In this article, the issue of religious plurality and diversity in Javadi Amoli's views and his answer to the following main questions is examined. The purpose of this study is to use a descriptive-analytical method to typology of Javadi Amoli's view on the issue of religious diversity and to include his answers to the three main questions of the issue of religious diversity, namely the question of rightfulness, the question of salvation and the question of interaction of followers of religions. This issue should be determined. In order to achieve this goal, Javadi Amoli's view on the question of rightfulness based on the unity of religion and nature, critique of relativity in the subject and reality and the issue of righteousness are analyzed and it is shown that Javadi Amoli has a more exclusive position on the rightfulness of religions. Javadi Amoli, in response to the question of salvation, takes an inclusive approach by raising issues such as guidance and disability. In response to the way they interact with the followers of other religions, they also believe in peaceful coexistence based on criteria and coexistence, a coexistence that is practically based on an inclusive attitude towards religious plurality and plurality.
